The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of multicomponent training on baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) and heart rate (HR) complexity of prefrail older adults. Twenty-one prefrail community-dwelling older adults were randomized and divided into multicomponent training intervention group (MulTI) and control group (CG). MulTI performed multicomponent exercise training over 16 weeks and CG was oriented to follow their own daily activities. The RR interval (RRi) and blood pressure (BP) series were recorded for 15 min in supine and 15 min in orthostatic positions, and calculation of BRS (phase, coherence, and gain) and HR complexity (sample entropy) were performed. A linear mixed model was applied for group, assessments, and their interaction effects in supine position. The same test was used to assess the active postural maneuver and it was applied separately to each group considering assessments (baseline and post-intervention) and positions (supine and orthostatic). The significance level established was 5%. Cardiovascular control was impaired in prefrail older adults in supine position. Significant interactions were not observed between groups or assessments in terms of cardiovascular parameters. A 16-week multicomponent exercise training did not improve HR complexity or BRS in supine rest or in active postural maneuver in prefrail older adults.

Frailty is related to a decrease in the physiological reserves, which causes difficulties in maintaining homeostasis. An example of physiological mechanisms for cardiovascular homeostasis is the baroreflex. The aim of this study was to compare baroreflex among frail, prefrail, and nonfrail individuals, in supine and orthostatic positions. Community-dwelling older adults were evaluated and categorized into frail, prefrail, or nonfrail groups, according to frailty phenotype. The RR interval (RRi) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) series were recorded for 15 min in the supine and 15 min in the orthostatic positions. Mean and variance of RRi and SBP, and baroreflex evaluated by phase, gain (α), and coherence (K2) were determined. A two-way repeated measures ANOVA, with Tukey's post hoc, was applied for group, position, and their interaction effects. The significance level established was 5%. Prefrail and frail participants did not present a significant decrease in mean values of RRi after postural challenge (893.43 to 834.20 ms and 925.99 to 857.98 ms, respectively). Frail participants showed a reduction in RRi variance in supine to orthostatic (852.04 to 232.37 ms2). Prefrail and frail participants showed a decrease in K2 after postural change (0.69 to 0.52 and 0.54 to 0.34, respectively). Frail participants exhibited lower values of K2 (0.34) compared to nonfrail and prefrail participants (0.61 and 0.52, respectively). Baroreflex indicated the presence of decoupling between heart period and SBP in frail and prefrail. Thus, reduced K2 might be a marker of the frailty process.

The objective of this study was to use linear and non-linear methods to investigate cardiac autonomic modulation in healthy elderly men and women in response to a postural change from the supine to the standing position. Fourteen men (66.1 ± 3.5 years) and 10 women (65.3 ± 3.3 years) were evaluated. Beat-to-beat heart rate was recorded in the supine and standing positions. Heart rate variability was studied by spectral analysis, including both low (LFnu-cardiac sympathetic modulation (CSM) indicator) and high (HFnu-cardiac vagal modulation (CVM) indicator) frequencies in normalized units as well as the low frequency/high frequency (LF/HF) ratio. Symbolic analysis was performed using the following indexes: 0V% (CSM indicator), 1V% (CSM and CVM indicators), 2LV% (predominantly CVM indicator) and 2ULV% (CVM indicator). Shannon entropy was also calculated. Men presented higher LFnu and LF/HF ratio and lower HFnu and 1V% symbolic index (57.56, 4.14, 40.53, 45.96, respectively) than women (24.60, 0.45, 72.47, 52.69, respectively) in the supine position. Shannon entropy was higher among men (3.53) than among women (3.33) in the standing position, and also increased according to postural change in men (3.25; 3.53). During postural change, the LFnu (24.60; 49.85) and LF/HF ratio (0.45; 1.72) increased, with a concomitant decrease in HFnu (72.47; 47.56) and 2LV% (14.10; 6.95) in women. Women presented increased CSM in response to postural change and had higher CVM and lower CSM than men in the supine position. In conclusion, women in the age range studied presented a more appropriate response to a postural change than men, suggesting that cardiac autonomic modulation may be better preserved in women than in men.